AROTC Day in the Life

AROTC Day in the Life Hi, I am Cadet OBrien. I am a Junior at MIT majoring in course 3 (Materials Science and Engineering) and an MSIII cadet in the Army ROTC program here at MIT. AROTC allows you to be pretty flexible in how involved you are in the program. You can do the minimum 3 times per week PT (physical training), one military class, and one leadership lab. But Im not here to talk about minimum requirements. I like being as involved as possible, and I want to show you how awesome that can be. Once a semester we go on FTXs (Field Training Exercises). These are 3 day long ventures out into the field where we sleep under the stars at night (or under the rain) and during the day we practice our tactics. We are broken into squads of around 9 with people from other ROTC programs like Northeastern and BU who we have never met before, and set off with everything we brought with us (our sleeping bag, extra boots, dry socks, food, etc.) packed on our back. Suddenly, theres a mission. Theres an enemy bunker 400 meters away. Youve got two hours to destroy it and be out of there. That means 10 minutes to come up with a plan. You plot the grid point on the map and plan the best way to attack. You brief your squad the Operations Order: the situation, your mission, how youre going to do it, what support you have (if any), and the callsigns of higher, and passwords so you can identify friendlies. Each team has its purpose and they know what to do. A few rehearsals later, and its time to step off. Your squad moves in its formation through the woods, wrestling with branches and using hand signals to communicate. You come across an open area, which you saw on the map and devised a plan for. Everyones doing what theyre supposed to. Suddenly, a whistle INCOMING!! you scream, and your squad hits the dirt. An ArtieSim (Artillery simulator) explodes somewhere by a tree. Theres little time: you yell out a distance and direction and your squad sprints that far as fast as they can. You consider yourself lucky, at least no one was hit. But you would know what to do if you hadnt been so lucky. You move quickly into the woods and out of sight. Time to take out a bunker. At the end of the mission, we talk about what was good, and what we should have handled better. These simulated missions are fun, but they prepare us for the day when we may have to take out a real enemy bunker. We put ourselves in this manufactured stress environment so that we can one day make the real life and death decisions. During the summer, we have the option to be regular civilians, or to attend awesome schools like Airborne (parachuting out of planes) and Air Assault (rappelling out of helicopters). I spent my freshman summer at Airborne school in Ft. Benning, Georgia learning how to jump out of airplanes, the Army way. That means you go out the door by yourself, sometimes with a combat load dangling around your knees. It was incredibly fun and I met Army people from all over the country and enlisted members of other services. For my sophomore summer, I applied to attend West Points summer training. I was placed in a company of West Point cadets and trained with them at Camp Buckner doing things like patrolling, land navigation (both day and night), marksmanship, urban tactics, and water confidence. We got to shoot howitzers for an entire day, and the training ended with a long run back to West Points main campus. I consider myself incredibly fortunate to have been able to train with the cadets at West Point. They were some of the best people Ive had the pleasure of knowing, and Im excited to be officers with them. Now, Airborne and West Point were optional. This summer, I will be going to mandatory training called LDAC (Leadership Development Assessment Course) with AROTC cadets from all over the country. In order to be able to commission as an officer, we have to pass LDAC. We are graded on our leadership skills and at the end, we go on a simulated deployment where we conduct missions like the ones we practice during FTXs. In my experience, ROTC makes you appreciate things that other people take for granted, introduces you to many new faces, and makes you more confident in everything you do. Post Tagged #ROTC

Parts of the Body German for Beginners Lesson

Claudius The Second Roman Emperor Of The Julio Claudian...

Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus, more commonly referred to as Claudius, was appointed as the fourth Roman Emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, following the assassination of his nephew and preceding Emperor, Caligula, in 41 A.D. (Wasson, 2011) Despite the initial pessimistic perspective held by prominent Roman figures regarding his performance as Emperor, Claudius proved to be an efficient leader whom increased the autocratic nature of Rome through his Empire expansion campaigns and policies that strengthened his position within Roman society. Under his reign, the annexation of Britain, as well as other provinces occurred, which was considered to be one of the most ambitious military campaigns of the 1st century. Claudius implemented†¦show more content†¦(Alston, 2013) According to ancient Roman statesman and historian, Cassius Dio, who recorded useful information about the events of Claudius’ return to Rome after spending only sixteen days in the British territor ies, the Senate granted him permission to celebrate a triumph, voted to allow for an annual festival to commemorate the event, and ordered that two triumphal arches be elected in the city and the other in Gaul. (Dio, 200 A.D.) Although, the Senate determined that Claudius was to receive a triumph celebration and honour in his name, not all agreed with the treatment he obtained. Suetonius disparaged his triumph by claiming Claudius’ role in the campaign was â€Å"of little importance†. Suetonius’ opinion on Claudius’ role derives from his set of biographies, The Twelve Caesars, which was written in AD 121, long after the reign of Claudius, rendering him a secondary source. It is also worth noting that bias towards the Senate was evident throughout his writings, with many references suggesting he reflected the same perspective on each Emperor, as the Senate did. In the case of Claudius, he would have negatively viewed him as the Senate did. (Suetonius, 121 A.D.) Nevertheless, Romano-Jewish historian, Josephus recorded a similar judgment on Claudius’ role in the campaigns and claims that a â€Å"triumphShow MoreRelatedJulia Agrippin An Impeccable Pedigree1444 Words   |  6 Pagestime. She was born into a Julio-Claudian family background that shaped and influenced the woman Agrippina the Younger became. Throughout her life her actions and ambitions were heavily critiqued as they went against the social norms and expected role of women of her time. Motivation: Agrippina the Younger found inspiration and motivation from her powerful, yet somewhat dysfunctional family. Her mother, Agrippina the Elder, was considered to be a good example of a Roman Mater. Agrippina’s parentsRead MoreAgrippina Influence1557 Words   |  7 Pagesinfluenced her power before her marriage to Claudius. She was born into the Julio-Claudian bloodline making her an Imperial woman of a noble dynasty, she was as a result of her family background reasonably wealthy and educated, she had the backing of the Roman Army as her father Germanicus was the commander of the 5th legion of the army in Germany and finally her two marriages which provided her with wealth and a son to be heir of the throne. The Julio-Claudian dynasty ran strong before and after the birthRead MoreTiberius- Roman Empire1507 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Tiberius was the second emperor of Rome and a highly-successful soldier whose reputation for arrogance and debauchery is probably unfounded† (BBC History) Tiberius was a significant Julio-Claudian emperor who applied a great deal of contributions to the Roman Empire during his reign†¦ The Julio-Claudian dynasty refers to the first five  Roman Emperors:  Augustus, Tiberius,  Caligula  (also known as Gaius),  Claudius, and  Nero and the family to which they belonged. They ruled the  Roman Empire  from its formationRead More Emperor Claudius Essay2578 Words   |  11 Pages Introduction Tiberius Claudius Nero Germanicus (b. 10 BC, d. 54 A.D.; emperor, 41-54 A.D.) was the third emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. His reign represents a turning point in the history of the Principate for a number of reasons, not the least for the manner of his accession and the implications it carried for the nature of the office. During his reign he promoted administrators who did not belong to the senatorial or equestrian classes, and was later vilified by authors who did. He followedRead MoreFrontier Policy and the Maintenance of the Pax Romana1904 Words   |  8 Pages Tiberius and Claudius The Imperium Romanum (Roman Empire) was a vast domain containing large territorial holdings in Europe and the Mediterranean. Beyond the empire however consisted of barbarous nations that were a constant threat to the Roman boundaries. For this reason, it was necessary for well-functioning frontier policies to be administrated and sustained to protect the outskirts of the empire from invasion. During the Julio-Claudian dynasty both Tiberius and Claudius established manyRead MoreRoman Empire1506 Words   |  7 Pages  The Roman Empire was the post-Republican period of the ancient Roman civilization, characterized by government headed by emperors, and large territorial holdings around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe, Africa, and Asia. The 500 year old republic which preceded it was severely destabilized in a series of civil wars and political conflict, during which Julius Caesar was appointed as perpetual dictator and then assassinated in 44 BC. Civil wars and executions continued, culminating in the victoryRead MoreAgrippina the Younger Essay3935 Words   |  16 PagesPersonality Agrippina The Younger Historical Context Roman Social and political structures Imperial Family Emperor From the time of Augustus, exercised total control over * Political * Military * Economic * Religious affairs Family Members of the Juio-Claudian family enjoyed considerable power and influence Upper Classes Consular Came from noble families – senators who had achieved office of consul and were respected because of their experience and authorityRead MoreMidterm 3 History Essay8024 Words   |  33 Pagesand touches no man’s property, those who dreaded him most will become his warmest admirers.†   What did he mean? o   Ã‚  Cicero was referring to Caesar’s use of Clementia (â€Å"mercy†), which gave him merit and legitimized his conquest in the eyes of the Roman people as a protector. o   Ã‚  They would see him as the just one and would end up supporting Caesar.  ·   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  What happened when Caesar tried to sail to Greece in pursuit of Pompey? o   Ã‚  Bibulus had blockaded half of Caesar’s troops and supplies whenRead MoreChristian Persecution2039 Words   |  9 Pagesfifth and final Roman Emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. His full name was Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, but when he was adopted by his great uncle Claudius and became his heir to be the next Roman Emperor hi name changed to Nero Claudius Ceasar Augustus Germanicus. He succeeded to the throne on 13 October, 54, after Claudius’s death. â€Å"During his rule from 54 to 68 Nero focused much of his attention on diplomacy, trade, and increasing cultural-capital of the empire.† His rule as Emperor was often associatedRead MoreSacred Scripture2629 Words   |  11 Pagessymbolizes baptism. ------------------------------------------------- Manna: symbolizes the Eucharist. Read Psalms 2, 19, 23, 51, 110, 139 Moses: c.1200 leads Israel out of Egypt Joshua: c.1100 leads Israel into the land of Canaan. David: 1010-970 BC—second king of Israel, brings ark of the covenant to Jerusalem, his new capital. Solomon: 970-930 BC—third king, builds temple, places ark of the covenant inside the temple. Psalm 2: anointedMessiah Psalm 19: the ten commandments Psalm 23: the Christological

Rhetoric Free Essays

Scott started a seminal debate within the rhetoric community with his essay, â€Å"On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic. † His argument – rhetoric is epistemic – has been analyzed and/or criticized by many scholars. Scott himself followed up in 1976 with an article titled, â€Å"On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later† in order to address some of these concerns, and add to his original thoughts. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetoric or any similar topic only for you Order Now Despite this follow-up, authors still continue criticize and defend his work. This essay will focus on three responses in particular, each focusing on a different aspect of Coot’s argument, in order to prove that rhetoric is in fact epistemic. First, Brunette’s, Three Meanings of Epistemic Rhetoric (1979) will examine three possible meanings and implications of Coot’s claim. Second, Harping’s What Do You Mean, Rhetoric is Epistemic? (2004) will hone in on the debate between Scott and Cheerier and Haskins, defining the positions of each. Finally, Banshee’s The Cartesian Anxiety in Epistemic Rhetoric: An Assessment of the Literature (1990) will address four key positions within the debate, and bring them together with his Bernstein term, â€Å"Cartesian Anxiety. From these responses it will become clear that while many scholars agree that rhetoric is epistemic, their definitions and viewpoints still vary. Before Jumping into the responses of other scholars, it is probably worth examining Coot’s own response, especially since it predates the essays soon to be examined. In this essay, Scott attempts to address three questions: â€Å"Is there one way of knowing or many? What sort of knowing does rhetoric strive to achieve? Is rhetorical relativism vicious? † (1976, 259). He states that there are many ways of knowing, emphasizing the lyricist nature of Ways of knowing. ‘ He believes that rhetoric should strive to achieve an actuality, or an agreed social construction (later it will become apparent that this facet of his argument is the one sparking the most debate). Finally, he attempts to dispel the positivist argument against him, that rhetorical relativism is vicious. This leads to some deeper discussion on the nature of subjective knowledge, of which his defining argument seems to be: â€Å"Relativism, supposedly, means a standard-less society, or at least a maze of differing standards, and thus a cacophony f disparate, and likely selfish interests. Rather than a standard-less society, which is the same as saying no society at all, relativism indicates circumstances in which standards have to be established cooperatively and renewed repeatedly’ (1976, 264) Brume seeks to offer up what he deems to be the three prevailing philosophies on epistemology. The first is what is considered the positivist view, which is essentially that there is a truth out there, and that people are either right or wrong about what they think is true. He emphasizes that rhetoric is the path to reaching that truth. The second is the classic interpretive approach, that different groups have different realities, and there knowledge within them. This means that within a group, someone can be wrong, although that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re wrong in all groups. Finally, he addresses the view that the world is much too complicated for humans to understand, which is evidenced by our need to define and label everything. Harping focus on defining terms, as he sees this as the most critical step in defining hitherto as epistemic. Specially, he examines the nature of â€Å"certainty’ and the implications of various definitions and views. Next he examines the term â€Å"rhetoric,† whose definitions has implications not Just in this debate, but for all rhetorical theory. Here he addresses the pros and cons of defining rhetoric in a broad or specific sense. Finally, Harping examines Justification, and how various scholar use justification within the realm of epistemology. Bingham compares four positions within ‘rhetoric as epistemic’ literature. How to cite Rhetoric, Papers

Nics Have Been and Continue free essay sample

‘Newly industrialised countries have been and continue to be, the driving force of globalisation. ’ To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalisation is expressed in transcontinental flows and networks of activity, interaction and power between countries, irrespective of geographic distance. It establishes and maintains economic, political and socio-cultural relations. This interaction helps economies through growth in international trade, investment and capital flows.Some factors that have acted as the driving force of globalisation include technological innovation as it had made transport and communication around the world easier, capitalism and trade have also played an important role in encouraging globalisation. Trade between countries in the developed world and the developing world has specifically been the biggest driving force of globalisation. A Newly industrialised country is a country whose level of economic development is somewhere between the development of the developing and developed countries.This is because these countries have moved away fro m an agricultural based economy into a more industrialised, urban economy. We will write a custom essay sample on Nics Have Been and Continue or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page There are several factors that make Newly Industrialised countries the driving force of globalisation. Firstly, most newly industrialised countries have a large population; this makes the countries more attractive for investment as these countries have an abundance of cheap labour. Therefore, these countries seem more attractive to investors as they can make more profits when the cost of labour is cheap.However, this also attracts TNC’s to the country. For instance, Nike contracts out production to South Korean and Taiwanese countries which operate in their home country as well as low wage countries like Philippines and Vietnam. Nike makes a chocking 100% profit by buying these shoes from contractors in South Korea and Vietnam for $18 and selling it to retailers for ? 72. Another factor that makes Newly Industrialised countries the driving force of globalisation is economic integration. South Korea is a Newly Industrialised country, back in the 1980s international trade tariffs were reduced and open trade was encouraged in South Korea. These measures were introduced as there were extremely high taxes in South Korea, which widened disparity made many people suffer. South Korea’s economic success was a result of a competitive education system and a highly skilled and motivated workforce. In the 1970s and 1980s, South Korea became the leading producer of ships, one of the ajor ship building countries being Hyundai but this industry began to decline in the mid-1980s as a result of the oil glut and world-wide recession. However, South Korea is once again the world’s most dominant ship builder with a 50. 6% share in the global shipping market as of 2008. Construction has also been an important in the South Korean export industry since 1960s and remains to be a critical source of foreign currency. By 1981, overseas projects, mostly in the Middle-East accounted for 60% of the work undertaken by South Korean construction companies.South Korea’s Samsung CT Corporation also built many remarkable buildings such as the Petronas Towers and Burj Khalifa. During the 1960s, South Korea was extremely dependent on the U. S. A to supply its armed forced but after President Nixon’s policy of Vietnamization was removed in the 1970s, South Korea began to manufacture many of its own weapons. In 2010, South Korea’s defence exports were $1. 5 billion. South Korea’s remarkable technological advancement and industrialization has allowed it to produce extremely powerful military equipment.Therefore, South Korea wasn’t always a driving force of globalisation until the 1960s when the government set up an export-led growth economy. South Korea’s openness to trade allowed firms to take advantage of economies of scale, which was encouraged by export activity and South Korea’s exports have made it the driving force of globalisation. South Korean economies have also flourished by encouraging appropriate manufacturing activities such as ship-building and then diversifying into higher-value-added activities such as Armaments, as labour becomes more skilled and capital more easily available.Another factor which makes Newly Industrialised countries a driving force of globalisation is low taxes in trade. Hong Kong is another Newly-Industrialised country that has been a driving force of globalisation. The Hong Kong do llar is the eighth most traded currency in the world. Following the Second World War, Hong Kong industrialised rapidly as a manufacturing centre driven by exports and then underwent a rapid transition to a service based economy in the 1960s. It is now the world’s leading centre for I. T, business consultation and professional services.Hong Kong is also the world’s largest re-export centre, most of Hong Kong’s exports are re-exports mainly made in Mainland China. Hong Kong now serves as a point of entry for investment flowing into Mainland China. Hong Kong’s largest export markets are Mainland China, the U. S. A and Japan. Even though Hong Kong has few resources, it is attractive to firms and businesses because it offers businessmen a stable government, low taxes and minimum official interference. Hong Kong’s free money market has also eased payment problems for many buyers.Its wide range of commuting facilities as well as a duty-free port has encourages many foreign companies to maintain their sales offices there. Hong Kong’s assets include skilled labour and investable funds brought by an influx of refugee labour and capital from China. Hong Kong was also extremely flexible and easily adapted to international demand. For instance, new products were introduced and old ones adapted to consumer needs in different countries. Another factor which makes Newly Industrialised countries the driving force of globalisation is cheap factors of production.Hong Kong’s largest industry in the textile industry but Hong Kong can compete in the textile market effectively because its production costs are low due to an absence of exchange controls and raw materials can be bought in the cheapest market. Even though competition has kept wage rates low, the living cost has also been kept low by the same forces. Therefore, Hong Kong too plays an important role in the world market and could be considered a driving force of globalisation but perhaps Hong Kong is only part of the world market as a result of its stable government; support for free enterprise and low taxes.Another factor which makes Newly Industrialised countries the driving force of globalisation is investment in technology and the use of technology, which acts as a vector for communication. For instance, Singapore has one of the highest capita per inco me and it has made several achievements such as best airport, least corruption and least bureaucratic country. Singaporeans have a Swiss cost of living but not a Swiss standard of living. Unlike Hong Kong, Singapore wasn’t developed through laissez faire, free market policies that encouraged entrepreneurs but by vigorous central planning.Its post-independence government embarked on a vigorous programme to promote economic growth by welcoming high-tech Multi-National Companies, making it a big exporter of disc drives, enforced high savings in its citizens, a higher standard of education, tourism and efficient transport links between Singapore and the rest of the world. This ‘command economy’ system certainly worked and convinced the government to introduce three new strategies, which involved promoting entrepreneurialism, persuading private and state companies to nvest overseas to overcome the limitations of a small domestic market and to promote ‘computerization’. Even though it appears that Newly Industrialised countries are the drivers of globalisation, there are several factors that might disagree with this. For instance, much of t he Newly Industrialised countries’ success is thanks to its demographic gift of a large population. Also, entrepreneurs did well during the early years of industrialisation but much of their success was based on exploiting natural resources or cosy deals with their own government.These entrepreneurs even exploited foreign technology and the cheap local labour to make exports that they could send to eager foreign markets. However, as domestic markets were being opened to foreign competition, local labour hasn’t remained as cheap. India too is now facing rising labour costs. India’s outsourcing industry contributed to much of its economic book, a key factor which attracted Western companies were the low cost factor. However costs are rising as wages and the price of real estate goes up, and there is a headline inflation of 9% throughout the country.The growth in India’s IT industry also means that many people are switching jobs in order to get higher salaries. Therefore, local labour hasn’t remained as cheap. In order to cope with the changes brought by industrialisation and economic growth, countries are adopting policies which encourage people to innovate and finance technological advances. The environment is also at a serious risk, as there isn’t much concern for bio-diversity, there is air and noise pollution in these countries, elegant old buildings and green spaces are paved to make way for unremarkable office blocks and apartments to accommodate the growing population.Along with this economic growth, globalisation and development have also brought several social issues along with it. Some of these social issues include disparity, corruption and materialism, drug abuse and crime, the conflict between religion and secularism. Therefore, I don’t think Newly Industrialised countries are the driving force of globalisation. I think that exploitation of less developed countries and industrialisation are the driving force of globalisation.

Laughing and Crying essays

Laughing and Crying essays Laughing and Crying The bridge between laughing and crying is not long. During submarine deployments, it is customary to tell sea stories on those long boring mid-watches. During one particular mid-watch I told an amazing story that happened to me ten years earlier while stationed on my last submarine. This story shouldnt be told when your boss is part of the group because there could be repercussions that you may feel later. My story begins when I was on a submarine that was home-ported in Vallejo, CA. Like most naval bases it also has a McDonalds. The submarine was delayed for a scheduled underway this particular day and my division and myself decided to go to McDonalds for lunch. This McDonalds was laid out as any other McDonalds with a side entrance and a long seating area down the side. Most of the submarine crew was already there sitting on the side seats, and I proceeded up to the counter to place my order. I ordered a Combo Meal that came to $4.85 and gave the cashier a ten-dollar bill. She placed a five-dollar bill and the change on my tray as I was leaving. When I came around the corner to the area my shipmates were sitting, someone opened the doors to enter the restaurant and my five-dollar bill blew off my tray. I quickly glanced down and noticed it fell near the corner table were a lady and her two children were sitting. I continued to the table where I wanted to sit to put my tray down. I placed my tray on the table then turned to go back to retrieve my five-dollar bill. I went back to the area where my money blew off near the table the lady and her two children were sitting. I looked around and didnt see it, so I asked the little boy that was sitting on the end of the table if he had seen my five-dollar bill. He politely said no sir and then his mom asked can I help you and I told her th...

Causative Verbs in English for ESL Learners

Causative Verbs in English for ESL Learners Causative verbs express an action which is caused to happen. In other words, when I have something done for me I cause it to happen. In other words, I do not actually do anything, but ask someone else to do it for me. This is the sense of causative verbs. Intermediate to advanced level English learners should study the causative verb as an alternative to the passive voice.  There are three causative verbs in English:  Make, Have  and  Get. Causative Verbs Explained Causative verbs express the idea of someone causing something to take place. Causative verbs can be similar in meaning to passive verbs. Here are some examples for your comparison: My hair was cut. (passive)I had my hair cut. (causative) In this example, the meaning is the same. Because its difficult to cut your own hair, its understood that someone else cut your hair. The car was washed. (passive)I got the car washed. (causative) These two sentences have a slight difference in meaning. In the first, its possible that the speaker washed the car. In the second, its clear that the speaker paid someone to wash the car.   Generally speaking, the passive voice is used to place emphasis on the action taken. Causatives place the stress on the fact that someone causes something to happen. Causative Verb Examples Jack had his house painted brown and gray.The mother made her son do extra chores because of his behavior.  She had Tom write up a report for the end of the week. The first sentence is similar in meaning to:  Someone painted Jacks house  OR  Jacks house was painted by someone.  The second sentence indicates that the mother caused the boy to take an action. In the third, someone told someone to do something. Makeas a Causative Verb Make as a causative verb expresses the idea that the person requires another person to do something. Subject Make Person Base Form of Verb Peter made her do her homework.The teacher made the students stay after class.The supervisor made the workers continue working in order to meet the deadline. Haveas a Causative Verb Have as a causative verb expresses the idea that the person wants something to be done for them. This causative verb is often used when speaking about various services. There are two forms of the causative verb have. Subject Have Person Base Form of Verb This form indicates that someone causes another person to take an action.  Have  someone do something  is often used to management and work relationships.   They had John arrive early.She had her children cook dinner for her.I had Peter pick up the evening newspaper. Subject Have Object Past Participle This form is used with services that are commonly paid for such as car washing, house painting, dog grooming, etc.   I had my hair cut last Saturday.She had the car washed at the weekend.Mary had the dog groomed at the local pet store.   Note: This form is similar in meaning to the passive. Getas a Causative Verb Get is used as a causative verb in a similar way as have is used with the participle. This expresses the idea that the person wants something to be done for them. The causative verb is often used in a more idiomatic manner than have. Subject Get Person Past Participle They got their house painted last week.Tom got his car washed yesterday.Alison got the painting appraised by an art dealer.   This form is also used for difficult tasks we manage to complete. In this case, there is no causative meaning.   I got the report finished last night.  She finally got her taxes done yesterday.I got the lawn done before dinner.   Have done = Get Done Have done  and  get done  have the same meaning when used to refer to paid services in the past. I had my car washed. I got my car washed.  She had her carpet cleaned. She got her carpet cleaned.